AN OPEN LETTER TO MY FUTURE WIFE (AKA: 11 REASONS WHY I’M SINGLE)

Dear Future Wife,

Hello. I didn’t see you there. Maybe that’s because I’m blind as a bat, or the fact that I’m barely 5’1 so a lot of things (like short jokes) go right over my head. I’m not sure how you found this letter, but either way, here we are. If this relationship is going to go anywhere there are some other things, I think you have a right to know from the outset. Take some time and mull over what you learn. Then, you can make an informed decision about the future of our relationship and if things eventually go south, I can point to this letter and say with confidence that you were warned. 

1). I’m a writer. What this means has already been extensively covered, so I won’t beat a dead horse (particularly because I am not a fan of animal cruelty) but you must understand that writing is a very mood-driven moment-to-moment process that I do not always control. I write at bizarre times when the inspiration strikes, and I can’t promise when that’s going to be. I’m crazy. I’ll write and write and write and then tear the page completely screaming at the top of my lungs in frustration that it’s complete shit and that I’ll never write anything again. My future memoir has gone through seven working titles, yet I haven’t written a single page. I know that to be an artist you have to make art. Imagine that. So, while I’m perpetually stuck in my lunacy waiting for inspiration you’re going to have to deal.

2). My bookshelf is filled with books half-read. Some I’ll get to. Others I won’t. Regardless, when you eye it and curiously ask if you can borrow it, my reflexive answer will almost always be no. Why? “Because” I’ll say emphatically, I’m going to read it.” The reality that it’s sat on my shelf untouched for months means nothing. If the mood does strike me, I want to have the opportunity to read it without having to harass you to return it.

3). If it’s Sunday, it’s Meet the Press. That isn’t just a tagline, it’s a reality. I’m an unapologetic policy wonk and living in D.C. only adds fuel to the fire. I will religiously watch Meet the Press every single Sunday and I would love it if you would engage in a philosophical and political discussion with me at the same time. You’ve got be able to keep up with what’s going on in the world. I realize that the show itself is much more about David Gregory meeting the newsmakers and the spokespeople for the press and not so much the press themselves, but that’s really beside the point. If you want to really meet the press, watch Jay Carney during a press briefing. That’s some PR Jiu-Jitsu. That’s not to say David Gregory isn’t press, but calling it Meet David Gregory with David Gregory is more than redundant. Not only are we watching it, we’re doing it in sweats comfortably and there will be refreshments involved. Sure, it may only be an hour long, but this kind of political theater deserves popcorn.

4). I’m the most indecisive person you’ll ever meet. Or am I? In a word, yes. Where shall we go to dinner? Chinese? Mexican? I might want tacos, I’m not quite sure yet. Wait – didn’t we have one of those last week? I don’t care. I’m craving it. I want the fortune cookie, or the extremely addictive chicken enchilada, or whatever it is. While we’re on the subject, should we see the 7:30 showing at the nearest theater or the 8:00 showing at the theater that’s a little further simply because I know the seating will be nicer and it’s likely to be less crowded? Which shirt should I wear? I don’t care that we’re going to be sitting in the dark. I need something that brings out my eyes.

5). I combat my indecisiveness by going to Starbucks. As Tom Hanks observed in You’ve Got Mail, one of the great benefits of Starbucks is that it instills indecisive people like me with a tremendous sense of accomplishment by forcing us to make as many as six decisions in a matter of seconds just to order one cup of coffee. All it costs, according to Hanks, is $2.95. Of course, that was 15 years ago. Adjusted for inflation, the cost of that defining sense of self has more than doubled. So help you God if you expect anything from me ahead of my morning coffee.

6). I’ll kill spiders for you if you promise to get things from the top shelf for me. In case you missed it, see my note above about being super short. I’m convinced the only person who understands my plight in that regard is Peter Dinklage. Thanks to Cerebral Palsy I have balance and coordination issues, too, so please don’t ask me to climb on a ladder or a step stool unless you want me falling and ending up in the ER. Been there. Done that. Bought the T-shirt. I’ll probably go there again many times, but I like to avoid the foreseeable disasters at the very least. 

Keep in mind that my preferred method of killing spiders is not quite the manly one that you envision. If I see something creepy crawly my first reaction is going to be throwing a shoe box at it and moments later tiptoeing up to it to see if it’s dead. At the slightest indication of movement, I will completely freak out, declare that portion of my apartment a disaster area, seal it with police tape, and never go back there again. The whole notion of that creepy crawly thing being more scared of me than I am of it is a complete fallacy. I don’t buy that for one iota, not even a second.

7). If it’s between April and October and it’s 1:05 or 7:05 it’s time for baseball. You’re welcome to join me, in fact I encourage it, but be warned that I am one of those people who screams at the TV during a game. Yes, I know it’s illogical, and yes, I know the players can’t hear me, but short of being in the stadium it’s the best I can do. I like to think that on some cosmic level my inane screaming actually has some positive impact on the decisions made in the game. Yes, I realize I’m at home watching this game, but I will wear my jersey anyway. I’ll argue balls and strikes with the umpire despite my vision and I’ll chastise players for not running fast enough or jumping higher at any given moment. With all that money they’re getting paid they should do whatever they have to do to win. If we lose, I’m going to be very upset, so it’s best to leave me alone.

I’m not going to tell you that you can’t go to visit relatives in Paris because it’s the playoffs and there’s a big rivalry happening— i.e., Yankees vs. the Red Sox—but they/you get major bonus points for taking that into consideration.

8). I’m not good at sharing my food. It’s my food, and I’m hungry. No, I’m not a jackass. I’m hypoglycemic. There’s a difference. I proportion my meals accordingly. Besides, anyone who’s ever asked me for “just a small bite” has redefined what the word “small” means to the point where I’m left wondering if I’m going to faint in the very near future as my blood sugar continues to drop and there isn’t an energy bar in sight.

9). I will quote random pieces of cinema on the fly and expect you to understand why and how it relates to what we’re talking about. I know you’ve never seen the movie (you’re working on that, right?) but I’m going to quote it anyway. The connection in my brain is there. The lines connecting one thought to another may be thin, but they exist, and I will expect you to keep up.

10). I will forever be stuck in the 90’s musically. Can I help it if that decade of music shaped my childhood and my thoughts on what would ultimately be defined in my head as “classic" music? No. So every time I hear “Hand in My Pocket“, “Tearin’ Up My Heart” or “Mr. Jones” I will sing it with every vocal bone in my body like I’m trying to turn a chair on The Voice. Speaking of the 90’s, "As Long as You Love Me” is a song title that belongs to the Backstreet Boys, not Justin Bieber. Stop causing brand confusion.

Along the same vein, playing songs on repeat is not an uncommon occurrence either, and there is usually a great story behind it ranging from inspirational/motivational kicks to pushing myself beyond emotional hang-ups. When you have the time, I’ll explain what prompted 15 straight hours of Tom Petty’s “Free Fallin’” or how John Mayer’s Battle Studies was responsible for getting me across the finish line during my master’s thesis.

11). Drinking is a rare occurrence unless I am in the company of longtime friends. Have you ever noticed how quickly alcohol turns people into one of the seven dwarfs? Think about it. Happy, Bashful, Dopey, Sleepy, Grumpy, Sneezy? As for Doc, well he was constantly mixing up words, losing his train of thought and mumbling. Need I say more? I’m just not into the whole thing. Plus, when you have C.P. another truth sets in rather quickly. I can barely walk when I’m sober, much less intoxicated. Acting/looking the part doesn’t require libations when you’re blessed with a neurological disorder the very nature of which restricts muscle movement and results in a shuffled gait among other things. On the rare occasion that I do drink, cycling through Kübler-Ross’ stages of grief is also likely. 

1          Denial. Here I am a few drinks in and trying to convince myself that walking across the room without injury is possible. “You can do it” says my drunk brain. My body clearly having other ideas, like staying sill in the name of self-preservation. 

2          Anger. “Damn it. I am going to do what I want. If I want to get up and move, I will.” I then promptly stumble and fall. That’s what I get for not listening.

3          Bargaining. I’m not a religious guy, but here it comes. “OK, God. I can’t afford to lose [any more of] my dignity in front of these people. Let me just get from point A to point B without injuring myself and I’ll be in synagogue first thing Saturday.” [Stumble] “OK. OK. Friday and Saturday. You win. “

4          Grief. This is where I’ll realize that despite all my personal achievements and the medical miracles to date, my quest to be a real boy will never include the ability to even feign being functionally drunk even at my best.

5          Acceptance. I know the effects of alcohol on my body. So, if I do drink and you happen to be there, consider it a sign that I place a tremendous amount of faith and trust in our friendship.

Now you know exactly what you’re getting into, for better or worse. When we do get married, I am having this letter appended to our prenup. But you’ll love me anyway, so it won’t matter. 

Sincerely,

I Told You This from Day One

FOUR CELEBRITIES THE MEDIA SHOULD LEAVE ALONE (BUT WON’T)

Being a celebrity opens one’s life up to public scrutiny, warranted or not. The truth is, we love our celebrity culture. Gossip magazines and websites thrive on it. Whether it’s TMZGawkerThe Smoking Gun, or BuzzFeed, we as a culture can’t get enough celebrity gossip. Much like the adage “if it bleeds, it leads”—if a celebrity shits in the woods—the media go berserk. Sometimes deservedly so, other times not.

Here is my list of four celebrities that the media need to leave alone, but won’t.  

mark-zuckerberg_gettyimages-512304736jpg.jpg

  #1 Mark Zuckerberg:

I’m tired of the world beating up on Mark Zuckerberg. I’ve said this before, and I will say again. He is not evil, and despite opinions to the contrary, he is not a close personal friend of Satan.

It’s easy to hate on Zuckerberg. He’s young, and rich. He’s built an empire that has made him extremely successful and he did so all without a college degree. With success comes its pitfalls, including those who frown upon the success of others simply because they themselves are not.

Zuckerberg gave us Facebook. He created the world’s most successful social network helping us connect with friends and family in addition to helping us forge new friendships along the way. Even as Facebook celebrates its ninth birthday, Zuckerberg continues to offer it without charging users financially. (Data collection is another discussion entirely.) That may not seem like much of a consolation, but for all the flack Zuckerberg gets about ongoing privacy concerns (something that his sister knows all too well, unfortunately) and for all the users whining about sudden unwanted changes, the masses act entitled. As I’ve advocated before, if you don’t like it, leave. Understandably, many have, myself included. My decision to quit last year however was based heavily on my perceived value from the site and growing concerns over privacy. At no point did the thought enter my mind that Zuckerberg himself was, as some have coined him, an “evil genius.”

His motives are unfairly questioned at every turn. When Facebook went public and investors lost money many felt conned by an inflated IPO and placed blame squarely on Zuckerberg. When he donated a $100 million to Newark Public schools in 2010 critics dismissed it as nothing more than a cleverly timed PR stunt to soften his image ahead of the release of The Social Network. Now, after penning an op-ed in the Washington Post Wednesday announcing the launch of a new political group, Fwd.us (pronounced “forward us”) aimed at promoting new immigration policy, detractors are already voicing concerns that his efforts are redundant arguing the tech lobby is well represented within Washington especially given many members of FWD.us are involved in other tech lobbies and have been for years. They say his presence merely crowds. I disagree. How many of those people have Zuckerberg’s notoriety and/or influence? Some, perhaps, but his presence only helps bring about change and awareness to an understandably divisive issue. Prior to Zuckerberg, how many of them were showing a passionate concern for immigration reform? A seasoned politician he is not, but he is a big voice in an even bigger industry and just maybe if it’s done right people will listen. So instead of once again shooting him down, can we all just pause and consider once again that maybe his motives here are genuine?

lindsay-lohan.jpeg

  #2 Lindsay Lohan

Lindsay Lohan is the celebrity that the media loves to hate. Her behavior makes her an extremely easy target, which she herself admits. Whether it’s drunk drivingtheftskipping out on her bill or, making a mockery of the justice system, Lohan seems to have done it all. She’s not just a celebrity – she is a celebrity on a downward spiral, a train wreck, and nothing satiates the public’s hunger pangs for gossip more than that.

Part of me believes that if the media left her alone for five minutes she might actually flourish. Naive? Perhaps. Then again, maybe not. What would happen if the well-being of the individual was placed ahead of the need to spin a story out of their latest meltdown? There are plenty of celebrities out there whom the paparazzi can chase and the media can take jabs at who aren’t simultaneously trying to reorder their life. Attempting to do it as Letterman did Tuesday night overstepped the boundaries. Letterman’s show, or any variety of late-night for that matter, is not meant to be hard-hitting journalism. Lohan was there to keep it light, fun, and promote a movie, which she was mostly able to do despite Letterman’s insistence on discussing her troubled past. If she truly believes that this latest stint in rehab – set to begin May 2 – will be the beginning of her road to recovery, this should be welcomed news. If she wants to keep her thoughts on that to herself and not talk about it, that’s her right.

To her credit, Lohan was calm, cool and collected during her 15-minute interview with Letterman showing a great sense of humor throughout. At times however, she was visibly uncomfortable and even teared up after Letterman praised her for having, “enough spine, enough sense of [herself], and enough poise” to come on the show despite all the jokes he’s made at her expense. Lohan alluded to a walk-on gag that saw her entering the stage with tags still on her dress and being chastised by Letterman, but the bit she said, didn’t get cleared in enough time.

This isn’t the first time that Lohan has demonstrated a sense of humor regarding her life either. She's lampooned herself on Saturday Night Live and most recently appeared as a guest star on Charlie Sheen’s FX series, Anger Management. Sheen, no stranger to public ridicule himself, has proven to be an ally and friend to Lohan offering her mentorship and guidance (to the extent he can) and jumping to her defense with recurring regularity, most recently during a chat with Leno Wednesday night amid rumors Lohan’s behavior on the set of Anger Management was disruptive and that she was once again caught red-handed with jewelry that wasn’t hers.

“It’s true but it’s not true. Nothing further your honor. She borrowed some stuff and then was told they would take it out of her paycheck, and she said fine and that’s all it was,” Sheen told Leno.

“I have a kinship with somebody who clearly needs a mentor, whether she wants one or not,” Sheen told TMZ last month. “She can continue to hang out with her dress-shredding club buddies, or turn to me for some advice from a guy who’s been down the road as well as every other side trail on the journey.

“If she listens, she’ll win,” Sheen said. “If she doesn’t, that’s on her.”

In fairness to Sheen, he’s demonstrated what a difference a year can make and if Sheen can do it, Lohan is certainly capable. The media just needs to leave her alone. Hopefully she’ll get that opportunity in rehab.

  #3 Jay Leno

MV5BMTgyMDk2MjAzM15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODMyMDQ4Mg@@._V1_UY317_CR12,0,214,317_AL_.jpg

Full disclaimer: I am firmly with Team Coco. I don’t agree with what Jay Leno did to Conan O’Brien at all. Perhaps the fact that his hand is now forced and he is passing off the baton to Jimmy Fallon in 2014 is merely the result of karmic debt that’s finally being paid. That being said, we need to cut Jay Leno a break. Life moves on and his legacy should not be based entirely on his handling of this particular situation. It happened, it’s done, and O’Brien is arguably achieving more success now than if the status quo remained.

Leno is 62, Fallon, 38. Yet, The Tonight Show remains at the top of the ratings despite claims by NBC brass that their selection of Fallon as Leno’s successor was driven by a desire to engage more directly with their audience by bringing what Variety called, “a generational shift in tone and content” to the show, namely through social media which Fallon uses avidly. But in the end, none of that is Leno’s fault. The landscape  changed, just as it did when he inherited the show from Carson in 1992. Yes, Carson walked away on his own terms and Leno doesn’t have that luxury, but the show remains a late-night juggernaut because of Leno, not in spite of him. While his reign as host of The Tonight Show may be over, the network should at least help him make as graceful an exit as possible after 20 years at the helm. (Yes, I said it.) I genuinely believe Leno deserves to be remembered for more than his late-night war with O’Brien over the fate of Tonight. Consider his charity work, or that he took a 50% voluntary pay cut ensuring fewer layoffs of his staff when NBC slashed the show’s budget. He doesn’t need the money, and he famously doesn’t spend a dime of his paychecks from NBC, but that’s hardly the point. That’s still his money to do with as he sees fit, and he chose to be selfless.

  #4 Barack Obama

I realize this one is an extremely tough sell, (that’s why he’s last).

As Leader of the Free World, there are politics both big and small at play with every decision he makes. We should absolutely pay attention to him. I would not have put him on this list at all were it not for his public relations nightmare related to his recent comments about California’s Attorney General, Kamala Harris. Those calling Obama’s remarks sexist are stretching it. His remarks  should be viewed as the afterthought that they were—not the centerpiece and foundation for his overall opinion of her as a person and the things she’s achieved—which he also noted. We’ve all seen the dangers of what happens when politicians get too comfortable at fundraisers, but even so, equating his remarks with sexism? That’s little too far. He apologized, she accepted. Let’s move on.

Some are also criticizing Obama’s latest push for gun control legislation claiming he’s exploiting the families of Newtown which is completely misguided. His critics argue gun control legislation has nothing to do with the families of the Newtown tragedy when in fact they were the last straw helping push this debate to the forefront of our country’s legislative agenda. Telling a story, crafting a narrative, helping people understand what shapes the rationale behind why we think the way we do—that’s context. Not exploitation. The families of Newtown are no doubt relieved and simultaneously thankful to know that in the midst of their grief something good will come from it, and they’re assured those they loved didn’t die in vain. The same same can be said for the victims of the Aurora Colorado shooting and the countless other acts of gun violence that have plagued our nation and catapulted this legislation into the national spotlight.

We live in a culture so driven by celebrity gossip that it can kill. The public’s insatiable thirst seems never to be quenched, but please, go pick on other more deserving people and leave these four alone.

Who else deserves to be on this list? Leave your thoughts.

SETH MACFARLANE: KING OF UNCOMFORTABLE.

seth-macfarlane.jpg

Tonight, for the first time in several years, I attempted to watch the Oscars. Unfortunately, 10 minutes into Seth MacFarlane’s opening monologue, (and that’s being generous) I already regretted my decision. Still, because I can’t ever seem to walk away from a train wreck, I kept watching. Save for a few good moments, that’s 3 ½ hours of my life that I will never ever get back.

Mr. MacFarlane, you made the Oscars extremely uncomfortable to watch. Seriously, that was beyond painful. I suspect the Academy knew you were going to be a horrible host which is why they tried to beat all the journalists to the punch with that headline bit starring William Shatner, or as my dad so affectionately refers to him, “The Shat.” I ran across a blog that posted a drinking game. It said simply, “Take a shot every time Seth MacFarlane doesn’t make you laugh. Also, don’t do this. You will die.” Well, glad to know I wasn’t alone in my misery.

As Olivia pointed out to me tonight, where are Tina Fey and Amy Poehler when you need them? Daniel Day-Lewis even proved he would have been a more effective host and he was only on stage for three minutes.

Continuing a string of awkward moments: I’m not sure whose brilliant idea it was to suggest the theme to Jaws as the play off music – that wasn’t only mean and unoriginal – but totally wrong. I have no plans on ever winning an Oscar, (sorry, mom) but Olivia did promise me an award for not being Seth MacFarlane which I think is far more kick ass. Sufficed to say that if anyone ever used the theme to Jaws to play me off the stage, I would be beyond livid.

Other awkward moments included: 

1). A seemingly drunk (or high) Kristen Stewart

2) Robert DeNiro caught on camera falling asleep

3). Ben Affleck’s acceptance speech for Argo taking a not-so-subtle dig at the Academy by saying that, “It’s hard, but you can’t hold grudges,“ detailing what has led to much of his success in Hollywood since winning his first Oscar for Goodwill hunting in 1998.

As someone who is a big fan of cinema, it’s a sad thing for me to admit that the Academy has become something to parody as of late.

All I can say is, next year, anybody would be better than Seth MacFarlane. Anybody.

THE COMICAL, THE BIZARRE, AND THE SENILE: THE GOP CONVENTION STARRING CLINT EASTWOOD

eastwood.jpg

All week long, watching the RNC provided no shortage of entertainment. I watched it gleefully expecting as much. Last night however, was perfection. Wine+Clint Eastwood+wooden chair - Barack Obama. Yup. Truly, My Chateau

More on that in a minute.

Short of the upcoming general election which I’m certain will be hilariously terrifying to watch unfold, I think the RNC gave much of America, or at least those of us with a sense of humor, a good laugh. 

Ann Romney appealing to middle class women by pretending to understand their struggles? Oh, look over there, is that her dressage horse competing in the Olympics? There’s also standard issue Romney freely admitting during one of the earlier Republican debates late last year that he never grew up poor. Which of course explained his lackadaisical $10,000 bet with then-rival Rick Perry. He can feel free to flip-flop on that one though and nobody will blink. No doubt about it, the Romneys understand the middle class.

There was Wednesday night and VP candidate Paul Ryan who, when you strip away his P90X body, well there just isn’t that much left. From his misleading statements on Obamacare, to the S&P credit rating downgrade and the debt commission, which Ryan conveniently neglected to mention he was not only a part of, but even voted against.

I expected the most comically absurd moments from the convention would be credited to Romney himself. I was wrong.

Billed as a “mystery speaker” in the hours leading up to his endorsement speech of the GOP candidate, the pinnacle of insanity instead went to writer-director Clint Eastwood, whose performance last night was memorable for all the wrong reasons. The disastrous speech quickly became an Internet meme spawning various spinoffs, like this one, and a new verb, “Eastwooding.” As Comedy Central’s Indecision 2012 Twitter feed pointed out, “That empty chair was less wooden than Mitt Romney.” So they have that going for them, that’s a plus.

In case you haven’t yet seen this gem

Now, I don’t know. That may have done Mitt Romney more harm than good in the long run. Though if you ask him, he enjoyed it. I guess the question on everybody’s mind is; Do you feel lucky, Mitt? Well, do ya?

Can’t wait to see how the DNC and Joe Biden top this.

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES SHOOTING IN AURORA, COLORADO

This morning, I awoke to news of the shootings that took place in Aurora, Colorado at the midnight premiere of The Dark Knight Rises. 

The gunmen, identified as 24-year-old James Holmes, a former PhD student at last count injured 58 people and killed 12. The more we learn from listening to news anchors, reporters, and press conferences held by local police, the more bizarre the events of the day become. Local authorities and bomb squad experts are currently at his apartment contemplating how they will disarm a series of explosives, and other “incendiary devices” noting that doing so could take days.

Understandably today’s event is a senseless tragedy. What shocks me even more, however, is that it is being publicized for political gain simply because it is an election year.

At approximately 10:45 A.M. Eastern time, President Obama made his first public remarks on the incident during what was originally billed as a campaign stop in Tampa, Florida.

 He made two statements that I find particularly troubling.

“We are still gathering all the facts about what happened in Aurora. What we do know is that the police have one suspect in custody, and the federal government stands ready to do whatever is necessary to bring whoever is responsible for this heinous crime to justice.” 

I’m not entirely sure what about this incident facilitates the involvement of the FBI and the federal government on any level. Law enforcement have said they believe Holmes acted alone and they do not believe this to be an incident connected to any terrorist organization.

President Obama goes on to say:

“I’m sure that many of you who are parents here had the same reaction that I did when I heard this news. My daughters go to the movies. What if Malia and Sasha had been at the theater? As so many of our kids do everyday. Michelle and I will be fortunate enough to hug our girls a little tighter tonight, and I am sure you will do the same with your children.”

I take issue with this statement for several reasons, not the least of which is that it is extremely disconnected from reality. Let’s examine just how many things are wrong with that statement.

1). The White House has its own movie theater and receives movies often ahead of their public release.

2). If the First Family were in a public movie theater, the place would be secured and cleared out entirely.

3). The First Family gets a well trained security detail.

Not exactly the same thing.

Watch the president’s full remarks here.

It’s a sad day in this country when the possibility of having to go through a metal detector to attend a two-hour movie becomes a frighteningly real possibility.

HISTORY MADE: SCOTUS UPHOLDS OBAMACARE

I was taught never to bury the lead. So without further ado:

And now; Romney’s reaction.

Watching this unfold internally was amazing.

SCOTUSblog was really the first to break the news correctly. The biggest decision since Bush V. Gore, and similarly, major news networks (I’m looking at you CNN, and FOX news) jumped the gun. Let Roberts read past the first page of the opinion before displaying misinformation as breaking news. 

Perhaps nobody had more fun reporting on the day’s chaos than The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart.

Chief Justice Roberts the swing vote? Nobody saw that one coming. Romney is regretting his pledge to nominate justices “in the mold” of John Roberts right now. Conservatives are in such disbelief over the supposed betrayal there’s already a movement calling for his impeachment

If today doesn’t provide you with a stark enough contrast for who you want leading our country come November, nothing will.